Re: “AI or happiness: Which ought to we select?” [Dec. 2, Opinion]:
My Take essay writer Nancy Colier sounds a warning about threats lurking within the quickly evolving world of synthetic intelligence. Accelerating capabilities of refined machines proceed largely with seemingly little concern for peculiar humanity. Colier argues for prioritizing folks over the intoxication of energy and revenue. Nonetheless, a moratorium on “progress” appears unlikely.
In 2000, Solar Microsystems co-founder Invoice Pleasure wrote an article revealed in Wired journal titled “Why the Future Does not Want Us.” It was an pressing name to all concerned within the growth of breakthrough applied sciences to cease such exercise to be able to consider the societal penalties. Pleasure lamented that many scientists and researchers have been “unusually silent” in regards to the prospect of doubtless catastrophic penalties.
At the moment, a lot of AI doyens admit they do not know the place all that is going. Clearly, there’s an instantaneous must not less than try to ascertain severe rules and guardrails to forestall avoidable and unintended disruptions.
Joe Martin, Seattle