Re: “To land one other airport, the state’s case should be ironclad” [Nov. 29, Opinion]:
The supervisor takes without any consideration that development in air site visitors is each inevitable and a great factor. Nonetheless, completely nobody needs a brand new airport close to them. Maybe all of us stand with the late newspaper columnist Emmett Watson and his “Lesser Seattle.” I definitely do.
Please return to a extra basic query than the way to finesse or shove a brand new airport down somebody’s throat and argue why our already overburdened transport infrastructure and grossly insufficient housing will profit from much more site visitors and folks.
It isn’t in any respect a matter in fact that the roles and revenue the editors are calling for make that case.
Eric Weissman, Bainbridge Island