Proof is rising to determine that Zionist forces killed their very own folks on October seventh. Zionist propaganda (often known as Hasbara) has instructed that Palestinian resistance forces had been accountable for their deaths, however the narrative doesn’t add up.
Since launching the Al-Aqsa Storm (Al-Aqsa Flood) operation 5 weeks in the past, the Zionist entity and its world brokers, belongings and supporters have maintained that the Palestinian resistance factions – which they inaccurately condense to the title ‘Hamas’ – have engaged in direct concentrating on of civilians, together with kids and infants.
Very early on there was a extensively reported declare that as much as 40 infants had been beheaded by “Hamas”. Even US President Joe Biden and different Western leaders fell for the rip-off.
The declare has now been rejected. It was backed by no proof and was sourced from settler and occupation navy reservist David Ben Zion, who has beforehand incited violent riots in opposition to Palestinians and referred to as for the annihilation of the occupied West Financial institution metropolis of Huwara.
New particulars from October 7
Within the weeks that adopted, a flurry of particulars emerged that forged doubt on different components of the official Zionist narrative.
These particulars got here from a mixture of physique digital camera and cellphone footage of individuals, eyewitnesses, prisoners launched by the resistance, and media reporting and video footage. The main points embrace:
- First within the census of deaths revealed and repeatedly up to date by Haaretz, a “liberal” Zionist paper, just one youngster below the age of 4 was listed as lifeless. The info additionally reveals that 16 kids between the ages of 4 and 17 had been among the many victims. This clearly reveals that the story of the beheading of 40 infants was false. The info doesn’t reveal something about infants or kids being killed.
- Second, the info compiled by Haaretz as much as November 7 confirmed that 374 out of 1,145, or 33 p.c, had been Israeli navy personnel, together with a small variety of kibbutz safety personnel, however not together with fireplace and rescue providers.
- Third, footage emerged of occupation forces participating resistance fighters from inside crowds of pageant goers. It indicated that many died within the crossfire.
- The truth is, a fourth British nationwide attending the pageant, additionally a member of the occupying forces, died after throwing grenades (reportedly again) at resistance fighters. Like many different younger British Jews, he had apparently been radicalized by the Zionist motion to such an extent that he was prepared to affix the occupation forces.
- Fifth, it was reported from inside Gaza that round 50 prisoners had died from Zionist indiscriminate bombing whereas being held by the resistance forces.
Essentially the most stunning particulars, nonetheless, had been stories of Zionist accountability for the deaths of a major variety of civilian prisoners and pageant attendees.
Music pageant thriller
First it emerged that the scene of burnt out and shot vehicles outdoors the music pageant was not the results of “Hamas” actions, however of pictures from occupation forces on the bottom or from Apache assault helicopters within the air.
Footage of festival-goers working from the positioning on foot seems to corroborate proof that evacuating by automotive was inconceivable as Zionist police had blocked the one manner out and, in no less than some circumstances, fired at those that approached themselves.
Danielle Rachiel described nearly being killed after fleeing the Nova music pageant: “After we bought to the roundabout [at a kibbutz], we noticed Israeli safety forces!” he remembered.
“We stored our heads down [because] we robotically knew they’d be suspicious of us, in a bit of beat up truck… from the identical path the terrorists had been coming from. Our forces began taking pictures at us! … our home windows had been damaged”.
It was solely once they shouted in Hebrew, “We’re Israelis!” that the taking pictures stopped.
As one helicopter pilot admitted: “It was extraordinarily tough to differentiate within the occupied outposts and settlements who was a terrorist and who was a soldier or a civilian”.
In complete, there have been reportedly “28 assault helicopters” firing “throughout” the day. They reportedly emptied “all of the ammunition of their bellies,” then rearmed repeatedly firing finally “a whole lot of 30 mm cannon shells … in addition to the Hellfire missiles.”
Based on stories within the Hebrew press, “the speed of fireside … was initially huge, and solely at a sure level did the pilots start to decelerate the assaults and thoroughly choose the targets.”
However sooner or later, “Apache pilots [decided] to skip all the constraints. It was solely round 9:00 a.m. that a few of them began spraying the terrorists with the weapons on their very own with out permission from superiors.”
Zionist behind the carnage
There are photos of burnt our bodies and likewise footage of many vehicles being burnt and destroyed in situ, in addition to footage produced by the occupying forces once they gathered all of the autos in a single place.
Most (maybe all or nearly all?) occurred because of the actions of the occupying forces. It’s not identified whether or not this accounts for a couple of, most or nearly the entire reported 260 civilian casualties from the pageant.
Second was the story of Yasmin Porat, who had attended the music pageant however fled to Kibbutz Be’eri. She said in an interview on Israeli radio that the Israeli navy had not distinguished between prisoners and resistance fighters.
“They eradicated everybody, together with the hostages,” she stated. This seems to contain the deaths of no less than 12 prisoners, together with her associate, apparently by gunfire.
Much more damning was the report of a settler who was away from Kibbutz Be’eri through the occasions.
The witness said that the occupation fired tank shells at homes with all their residents:
“His voice trembles as his associate, who on the time was besieged in his shelter, involves thoughts. Based on him, the IDF (Israeli navy) accomplished the takeover of the kibbutz solely on Monday night and solely after the commanders within the area had made tough selections – together with shelling homes with all their residents inside to remove the terrorists together with the hostages. ,” he stated.
“The associated fee was horrible: At the very least 112 Be’eri folks had been killed. Others had been kidnapped. Yesterday, 11 days after the bloodbath, the our bodies of a mom and her son had been found in one of many destroyed homes. It’s believed that extra our bodies are nonetheless lies within the rubble.”
Rubble of buildings and images
Given the truth that resistance fighters had been flippantly armed, the proof of buildings lowered to rubble and burnt corpses and homes appears to point that Zionist forces had been instantly accountable for it.
The identical is related with three pictures, two purporting to point out the burnt physique of a child and one a bloody however unburnt lifeless child, and with the declare that Hamas “roasted” a child in an oven.
Within the former case we’re already conscious {that a} child (not three) was listed among the many lifeless. The images had been unfold throughout social media, together with by the account @IsraeliPM X (previously Twitter) (which bought greater than 6 million views) and one among them by pro-Israel extremist Ben Shapiro.
This latter picture was allegedly discovered to be an AI-generated picture utilizing a supply picture of a small canine, though this was later disputed.
The latter case – with child within the oven – additionally appears to lack affirmation.
But when one among them was actual, the obvious rationalization for all of the accounts of burned infants is that the infants had been killed by incineration after the occupation forces attacked the residential homes the place they lived.
The Hannibal Directive
Killing prisoners seems to be in accordance with the little-known Zionist navy doctrine generally known as the Hannibal Directive. Though disputed by some, it appears believable that the doctrine was named after the Carthaginian basic who selected to poison himself reasonably than be captured by the Romans.
Created in 1986, and initially referred to as the Hannibal Protocol, it units as an overriding objective the necessity to keep away from the seize of Zionist forces, if essential, at the price of eliminating their very own forces. It remained a navy secret till 2003.
Throughout Israel’s floor assault on Gaza in 2011, a Golani commander was caught on tape telling his unit: “No soldier within the 51st Battalion might be kidnapped, at any value or below any circumstances. … even when it means his unit should now shoot on the getaway automotive.”
Later, the occupying power’s chief of workers, Benny Gantz, modified the directive. Introducing what’s described as an “moral” precept generally known as the “doctrine of double impact”.
It says {that a} dangerous end result (the killing of a captured soldier) is simply morally permissible as a facet impact of selling a great motion (stopping his captors).
This bears a putting resemblance to what occurred on October seventh. Zionist lies are crumbling earlier than our eyes.
