Right now in absurd rationalizations
Blood poisoning concern.
·
Friday, December 22, 2023
· 17 feedback
Through Political: Perhaps he was speaking about fentanyl? Some within the GOP are defending Trump’s “poisoning the blood” feedback.
I get it, generally a politician must take a clearly problematic story and spin it into their most well-liked narrative. However once more, generally a alternative is made that emphasizes the politician’s character.
Amid the continued fallout from former President Donald Trump’s feedback about immigrants — which have drawn comparisons to Adolf Hitler — some Republicans in latest days have jumped to his protection with an alternate principle: Perhaps he was really speaking concerning the fentanyl disaster.
Whereas some members of his social gathering have balked at or outright condemned the remarks, others have come to Trump’s help.
[…]
Late. JD Vance (R-Ohio) equally tried to hyperlink Trump’s feedback to the disaster that left greater than 105,000 People lifeless final yr.
“To begin with, he did not say that immigrants poisoned the blood of this nation. He stated that unlawful immigrants poisoned the blood of this nation, which is objectively and self-evidently true to anybody who seems on the statistics on fentanyl overdoses,” Vance stated, in response to The Hill.
The saying, “higher to be silent and be thought of a idiot than to talk and take away all doubt” involves thoughts.
Extra examples on the hyperlink.
About Steven L. Taylor
Steven L. Taylor is Professor of Political Science and Dean of the School of Arts and Sciences. His major areas of experience embody events, elections and the institutional design of democracies. His newest ebook is co-authored A Completely different Democracy: American Authorities in a 31-Nation Perspective. He received his Ph.D. from the College of Texas and his BA from the College of California, Irvine. He has been running a blog since 2003 (initially on the now defunct Poliblog). Observe Steven additional Twitter